Tuesday, June 02, 2015

PRIORITIES: "Man Threatening To Poop" Earns Police Response; Your Garage Being Burglarized Does Not

How twisted is Chicago's police dispatch policy? Very.

When three men ran out of a Lincoln Park boutique with $6,000 worth of merchandise last week, 911 operators refused to send police to the scene, citing a Chicago Police Department policy that says cases in which no offender is on-scene, no one is injured, and no major property damage is done are to be transferred to a police phone bank where a report may be filed without dispatching officers. (Please hold!)

So, even though a shop owner had just chased three men who stole thousands of dollars, she  did not qualify for an in-person police visit. You should expect the same if your garage is burglarized or any number of other crimes come your way.

Yet, police are routinely tied up on ridiculous matters that seem far less pressing than that merchant's circumstances. The volume and scope of calls that legitimately waste police resources is mind boggling.

Man Threatening To Poop

Yesterday, just a couple of blocks away from the store that couldn't get police service, a Subway restaurant reported that a homeless man had come into the store and urinated on their floor. He then threatened to poop on the floor.

The 911 call center dispatched two police cars for that situation. (AUDIO)

Not long afterwards, some guy in Uptown called 911 to report finding a "device" in his McDonald's milk shake. He got a police response. (AUDIO)

We could go on all day.

If the motive behind the police executives' no-cop policy is to reduce unnecessary use of police resources, they need to go back to the drawing board.

But if their motivation is to hamstring the reporting of legitimate crimes in an effort to manipulate statistics downward…well, they're doing a bang-up job.

Oh, yeah. On her sixth call to 911, the shop owner managed to secure an actual police response. She was lucky.
Email us.  Facebook us. Twitter us.


  1. Excellent photo of poop with aggressive police response. The only funny thing about this story, I'm afraid.

  2. I found one quiet corner of the 19 th District where no one is beating robbing shooting ect ect. Lucky days I ain't moving any time soon. Yes we have had serious crime on our block but they are very few and far between. The neighbors look out for each other and I feel blessed to live among these good people. If you are not secure in your day to day living, let that lease expire and make a move.

  3. Blah, blah, blah! You have to hit the city where it hurts! In the wallet. Stop going out at night, to the bars & restaurants, etc. If all the neighborhood residents would do that for just one week, maybe someone at City Hall would take notice. Damn the poor little shop owners. This is war! It's called sacrifice. Ever heard of that, you narcissists?

  4. "But if their motivation is to hamstring the reporting of legitimate crimes in an effort to manipulate statistics downward…well, they're doing a bang-up job."

    CWB, I believe you hit the nail on the head!

  5. Interesting article from CNN. Seems to confirm CWB's evidence of crime going up. http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/02/us/crime-in-america/index.html

    "After decades of a downward trend in crime, residents in some large U.S. cities wonder if a reversal is coming."

    I think it's going to get worse. People like Kristopher Pitts don't seem well suited for the modern economy. It's not like 50 years ago where you could get a decent living in a blue collar job with a high school education and hard work.

  6. Thanks for making me smile. .I haven't done that in a while with all the crime fears.

  7. This "alternate response" is the way that McCarthy is killing crime. The policy frustrates victims and makes it difficult for them to properly report a crime so they don't. And the COMSTAT people then claim a reduction in the crime stats.