Sunday, January 18, 2015

JUKING THE STATS: Robberies Shine Light On Statistics Game

Police sought this man for theft. 
But prosecutors have charged a
suspect with felony robbery.
Fresh questions about the Chicago Police Department's classification of violent crimes are rising to the surface today as prosecutors announce robbery charges against a 17-year-old in connection with cell phone "thefts" at the Wilson Red Line Station.

The Chicago Police Department issued an alert in the case on Friday and the boy, who lives just a couple of blocks from the station, was arrested over the weekend.

But here’s the riddle: If prosecutors have charged the teen with two felony counts of robbery, why are at least two of the cases classified as theft by the police department?(Classification information for the third case is not yet available to the public.)

The city's data portal shows that the police department classified two of the crimes as
misdemeanor theft. Information on the third crime is not yet available to the public.
 
Thefts, by law,
are non-violent crimes like taking someone’s phone off of a restaurant table. But, robbery is a violent crime—taking something by using physical force or threatening the use of force against a victim.

The Chicago Police Department, under pressure to improve upon impossible-to-believe double-digit crime “reductions,” is keenly interested in having as many robberies reduced to “thefts” as possible.

Chicago magazine’s 2014 report on the department’s crime-fudging methods is a must read for the unfamiliar.

Not Isolated

In another case that raises questions, a victim reported to police that he was robbed of his iPhone5 in Wrigleyville last year by three offenders who were "punching him in the face with closed fists."

The case, seemingly a straight-forward robbery, is classified as "theft" by the police department.

And fresh questions about classification are being raised this weekend.

As CWB reported earlier today, a man reported being beaten and robbed by a group of men in the 1100 block of School yesterday morning. For reasons that have not yet been explained by the police department, his case was classified as misdemeanor simple battery.

Police are said to be looking into the circumstances and classification of Saturday's incident.
----------
Email us. Facebook us. Twitter us.

5 comments:

  1. Saw Channel 7 cover the Wilson Station iPhone "thefts" Sunday morning. They showed the perps photo with his face blurred out. Is it because he was 17?

    And a dark blue hoodie under a gray hoodie sweatshirt? BAN HOODIES!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. numbers fuckery from the fine individuals that brought you COMPSTAT. CRIME IS DOWN, DAMNIT!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why is this question not geared toward the States Attorneys office? The police do not, and never have made the laws or the rules, they only enforce them. Law wise, those look like thefts, however the states attorney must have seen or gotten more information to upgrade this to a robbery. The police cannot upgrade a crime only the States Attorneys office can do this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A robbery is a robbery. Either there was force or a threat of force or there wasn't. Either these were robberies and the police miscategorized them or they were thefts and the defendant is charged with a crime he did not commit.

      Delete
    2. It all depends on the circumstances at the time and what the victim states. There are times the victim remembers later due to the shock of the experience. The police write the report per what is told to them. It is up to the states attorney to speak to the victim if an offender is caught and upgrade or downgrade charges. Not up to the police.

      Delete